We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our website, to show you personalized content and targeted ads, to analyze our website traffic, and to understand where our visitors are coming from.
BDC334
Practical Assessment
Author
AJ Smit
Published
August 29, 2024
You have been provided with three files:
BarentsFish.xls (a Microsoft Excel file with the full dataset and a description of the content on the first sheet)
Import the CSV files into R and answer the questions below.
The assessment is out of a total of 50 marks and you have 2 hours to complete it.
You are welcome to use any online resources to help you complete the test, but you may not communicate with anyone else during the assessment.
Question 1
List the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart in terms of the geographical distance between them. For each pair, also provide the temperature and depth associated with each member of the pair.
List three pairs of sites that are closest together in terms of the geographical distance between them. For each pair, also provide the temperature and depth associated with each member of the pair.
Communicate the above output in a clear and concise manner, for example, using a table. The same applies to the rest of the questions.
(/10)
Question 2
List the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart in terms of the environmental distance between them. For each pair, also state the environmental distance between them.
List three pairs of sites that are closest together in terms of the environmental distance between them. For each pair, also state the environmental distance between them.
(/10)
Question 3
Is there a relationship between the environmental variables? Produce the code for this analysis and the evidence (both graphical and statistical) for the nature of this relationship. If a relationship is present, describe it.
(/10)
Question 4
List the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart in terms of species composition between them. For each pair, also state the species dissimilarity between them.
List three pairs of sites that are closest together in terms of species composition between them. For each pair, also state the species dissimilarity between them.
(/10)
Question 5
Using all the answers given above to support your reasoning, discuss the implications of these findings in the light of the theory covered in the BDC334 module.
(/10)
TOTAL /50
Instructions
Submit a R script onto iKamva at the end of the test period. Label the script as follows:
---title: "BDC334"subtitle: "Practical Assessment"author: - "AJ Smit"date: "2024-08-29"title-block-banner: falsetoc: falseformat: html: toc: false embed-resources: true self-contained-math: true---You have been provided with three files:- [`BarentsFish.xls`](../../data/BarentsFish.xls) (a Microsoft Excel file with the full dataset and a description of the content on the first sheet)- [`BarentsFish_env.csv`](../../data/BarentsFish_env.csv) (a CSV file with the environmental data)- [`BarentsFish_spp.csv`](../../data/BarentsFish_spp.csv) (a CSV file with the species data)Import the CSV files into R and answer the questions below.The assessment is out of a total of **50 marks** and you have **2 hours** to complete it.You are welcome to use **any** online resources to help you complete the test, but you may not communicate with anyone else during the assessment.## Question 1a. List the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart in terms of the **geographical distance** between them. For each pair, also provide the temperature and depth associated with each member of the pair.b. List three pairs of sites that are closest together in terms of the **geographical distance** between them. For each pair, also provide the temperature and depth associated with each member of the pair.Communicate the above output in a clear and concise manner, for example, using a table. The same applies to the rest of the questions.<!-- ### Answer --><!-- ```{r} --><!-- library(vegan) --><!-- library(tidyverse) --><!-- env <- read.csv("../../data//BarentsFish_env.csv") --><!-- # a. List the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart in terms of the --><!-- # geographical distance between them. For each pair, also provide the --><!-- # temperature and depth associated with each member of the pair --><!-- # extract the lon and lat --><!-- geo_dat <- env[, c("Longitude", "Latitude")] --><!-- # calculate the geographical distance or use Euclidean distance as a proxy --><!-- # (use either function) --><!-- # geo_dist <- dist(geo, upper = FALSE) --><!-- # this step or the next one is possibly as far as you'll get with the --><!-- # code I gave you --><!-- # you can proceed manually from here by examining the matrices and cross --><!-- # referencing with the data files for the environmental data --><!-- geo_dist <- round(vegdist(geo_dat, method = "euclidean", upper = FALSE), 2) --><!-- # convert the distance object to a full symmetric matrix --><!-- geo_dist_matrix <- as.matrix(geo_dist) --><!-- # scan the matrix for the three largest distances and --><!-- # find the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart --><!-- # it is a pain to do by eye, but it is possible --><!-- # for my own convenience, I'll calculate it more efficiently: --><!-- # set the diagonal and upper triangle to NA since we only need the --><!-- # lower triangle --><!-- geo_dist_matrix[upper.tri(geo_dist_matrix, diag = TRUE)] <- NA --><!-- # find the indices of the three largest distances --><!-- # get the order of the matrix values in decreasing order, --><!-- # and select the first three --><!-- largest_dist_indices <- order(geo_dist_matrix, --><!-- decreasing = TRUE, na.last = NA)[1:3] --><!-- # retrieve the row and column indices of these largest distances --><!-- row_indices <- row(geo_dist_matrix)[largest_dist_indices] --><!-- col_indices <- col(geo_dist_matrix)[largest_dist_indices] --><!-- # combine the row and column indices into pairs --><!-- # I add the site temperature and depth values automagically --><!-- # but you can manually accomplish the same --><!-- largest_dist_pairs <- data.frame( --><!-- Site1 = row_indices, --><!-- Site2 = col_indices, --><!-- Distance = geo_dist_matrix[largest_dist_indices], --><!-- Site1_temp = env$Temperature[row_indices], --><!-- Site2_temp = env$Temperature[col_indices], --><!-- Site1_depth = env$Depth[row_indices], --><!-- Site2_depth = env$Depth[col_indices] --><!-- ) --><!-- largest_dist_pairs # this is what you get marked on --><!-- # b. List three pairs of sites that are closest together in terms of the --><!-- # **geographical distance** between them. For each pair, also provide the --><!-- # temperature and depth associated with each member of the pair. --><!-- # to do this, I'll adapt the code above to find the three smallest distances --><!-- shortest_dist_indices <- order(geo_dist_matrix, --><!-- decreasing = FALSE, na.last = NA)[1:3] --><!-- # retrieve the row and column indices of these largest distances --><!-- row_indices <- row(geo_dist_matrix)[shortest_dist_indices] --><!-- col_indices <- col(geo_dist_matrix)[shortest_dist_indices] --><!-- # combine the row and column indices into pairs --><!-- # I add the site temperature and depth values automagically --><!-- # but you can manually accomplish the same --><!-- shortest_dist_pairs <- data.frame( --><!-- Site1 = row_indices, --><!-- Site2 = col_indices, --><!-- Distance = geo_dist_matrix[shortest_dist_indices], --><!-- Site1_temp = env$Temperature[row_indices], --><!-- Site2_temp = env$Temperature[col_indices], --><!-- Site1_depth = env$Depth[row_indices], --><!-- Site2_depth = env$Depth[col_indices] --><!-- ) --><!-- shortest_dist_pairs # this is what you get marked on --><!-- ``` -->**(/10)**## Question 2a. List the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart in terms of the **environmental distance** between them. For each pair, also state the environmental distance between them.b. List three pairs of sites that are closest together in terms of the **environmental distance** between them. For each pair, also state the environmental distance between them.<!-- ### Answer --><!-- ```{r} --><!-- # a. List the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart in terms of the --><!-- # **environmental distance** between them. For each pair, also state the --><!-- # environmental distance between them. --><!-- # Again, I adapt pre-existing code but you'll do this manually as far --><!-- # as possible --><!-- # extract the lon and lat --><!-- env_dat <- env[, c("Depth", "Temperature")] --><!-- # calculate the geographical distance or use Euclidean distance as a proxy --><!-- # (use either function) --><!-- # geo_dist <- dist(geo, upper = FALSE) --><!-- env_dist <- round(vegdist(env_dat, method = "euclidean", upper = FALSE), 2) --><!-- # your code will bring you to the above step, and from there you can --><!-- # accomplish the rest manually to assemble the table by hand --><!-- # I'll continue with more efficient code... --><!-- # convert the distance object to a full symmetric matrix --><!-- env_dist_matrix <- as.matrix(env_dist) --><!-- # scan the matrix for the three largest distances and --><!-- # find the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart --><!-- # it is a pain to do by eye, but it is possible --><!-- # for my own convenience, I'll calculate it more efficiently: --><!-- # set the diagonal and upper triangle to NA since we only need the --><!-- # lower triangle --><!-- env_dist_matrix[upper.tri(env_dist_matrix, diag = TRUE)] <- NA --><!-- # find the indices of the three largest distances --><!-- # get the order of the matrix values in decreasing order, --><!-- # and select the first three --><!-- largest_dist_indices <- order(env_dist_matrix, --><!-- decreasing = TRUE, na.last = NA)[1:3] --><!-- # retrieve the row and column indices of these largest distances --><!-- row_indices <- row(geo_dist_matrix)[largest_dist_indices] --><!-- col_indices <- col(geo_dist_matrix)[largest_dist_indices] --><!-- # combine the row and column indices into pairs --><!-- # I add the site temperature and depth values automagically --><!-- # but you can manually accomplish the same --><!-- largest_dist_pairs <- data.frame( --><!-- Site1 = row_indices, --><!-- Site2 = col_indices, --><!-- Distance = geo_dist_matrix[largest_dist_indices], --><!-- Site1_temp = env$Temperature[row_indices], --><!-- Site2_temp = env$Temperature[col_indices], --><!-- Site1_depth = env$Depth[row_indices], --><!-- Site2_depth = env$Depth[col_indices] --><!-- ) --><!-- largest_dist_pairs # this is what you get marked on --><!-- # b. List three pairs of sites that are closest together in terms of the --><!-- # **environmental distance** between them. For each pair, also state the --><!-- # environmental distance between them. --><!-- # scan the matrix (made in 2.a) for the three largest distances and --><!-- # find the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart --><!-- # it is a pain to do by eye, but it is possible --><!-- # find the indices of the three largest distances --><!-- # get the order of the matrix values in decreasing order, --><!-- # and select the first three --><!-- shortest_dist_indices <- order(env_dist_matrix, --><!-- decreasing = FALSE, na.last = NA)[1:3] --><!-- # retrieve the row and column indices of these shortest distances --><!-- row_indices <- row(geo_dist_matrix)[shortest_dist_indices] --><!-- col_indices <- col(geo_dist_matrix)[shortest_dist_indices] --><!-- # combine the row and column indices into pairs --><!-- # I add the site temperature and depth values automagically --><!-- # but you can manually accomplish the same --><!-- shortest_dist_pairs <- data.frame( --><!-- Site1 = row_indices, --><!-- Site2 = col_indices, --><!-- Distance = geo_dist_matrix[shortest_dist_indices], --><!-- Site1_temp = env$Temperature[row_indices], --><!-- Site2_temp = env$Temperature[col_indices], --><!-- Site1_depth = env$Depth[row_indices], --><!-- Site2_depth = env$Depth[col_indices] --><!-- ) --><!-- shortest_dist_pairs # this is what you get marked on --><!-- ``` -->**(/10)**## Question 3Is there a relationship between the environmental variables? Produce the code for this analysis and the evidence (both graphical and statistical) for the nature of this relationship. If a relationship is present, describe it.<!-- ### Answer --><!-- ```{r} --><!-- # Is there a relationship between the environmental variables? --><!-- cor(env_dat) # this is what you get marked on) --><!-- ggplot(env, aes(x = Depth, y = Temperature)) + --><!-- geom_point() + --><!-- geom_smooth(method = "lm", se = FALSE) + --><!-- labs(title = "Relationship between Depth and Temperature", --><!-- x = "Depth (m)", --><!-- y = "Temperature (°C)") + --><!-- theme_linedraw() --><!-- # No, there is no relationship between the two variables. The correlation --><!-- # coefficient shows a value of -0.02, which is very close to zero. This is --><!-- # confirmed by the flat line in the correlation plot. --><!-- ``` -->**(/10)**## Question 4a. List the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart in terms of **species composition** between them. For each pair, also state the species dissimilarity between them.b. List three pairs of sites that are closest together in terms of **species composition** between them. For each pair, also state the species dissimilarity between them.<!-- ### Answer --><!-- ```{r} --><!-- # a. List the three pairs of sites that are furthest apart in terms of --><!-- # **species composition** between them. For each pair, also state the --><!-- # species dissimilarity between them. --><!-- spp_dat <- read.csv("../../data/BarentsFish_spp.csv") --><!-- # using Bray-Curtis for abundance data (could use something else) --><!-- spp_diss <- round(vegdist(spp_dat, method = "bray", upper = FALSE), 2) --><!-- spp_diss_matrix <- as.matrix(spp_diss) --><!-- spp_diss_matrix[upper.tri(spp_diss_matrix, diag = TRUE)] <- NA --><!-- largest_diss_indices <- order(spp_diss_matrix, --><!-- decreasing = TRUE, na.last = NA)[1:3] --><!-- row_indices <- row(spp_diss_matrix)[largest_diss_indices] --><!-- col_indices <- col(spp_diss_matrix)[largest_diss_indices] --><!-- largest_diss_pairs <- data.frame( --><!-- Site1 = row_indices, --><!-- Site2 = col_indices, --><!-- Dissimilarity = spp_diss_matrix[largest_diss_indices] --><!-- ) --><!-- largest_diss_pairs # this is what you get marked on --><!-- # b. List three pairs of sites that are closest together in terms of --><!-- # **species composition** between them. For each pair, also state the --><!-- # species dissimilarity between them. --><!-- smallest_diss_indices <- order(spp_diss_matrix, --><!-- decreasing = FALSE, na.last = NA)[1:3] --><!-- row_indices <- row(spp_diss_matrix)[smallest_diss_indices] --><!-- col_indices <- col(spp_diss_matrix)[smallest_diss_indices] --><!-- smallest_diss_pairs <- data.frame( --><!-- Site1 = row_indices, --><!-- Site2 = col_indices, --><!-- Dissimilarity = spp_diss_matrix[smallest_diss_indices] --><!-- ) --><!-- smallest_diss_pairs # this is what you get marked on --><!-- ``` -->**(/10)**## Question 5Using all the answers given above to support your reasoning, discuss the implications of these findings in the light of the theory covered in the BDC334 module.<!-- ### Answer --><!-- Anything that is not wrong, provide explanations for the patterns observed, relates the environmental similarities and differences to the species similarities and differences, and discusses the implications of these findings in the light of the theory covered in the BDC334 module. -->**(/10)****TOTAL /50**## InstructionsSubmit a R script onto iKamva at the end of the test period. Label the script as follows:**`BDC334_<Surname>_<Student_no.>_Practical_Assessment.R`**.Within the R script, ensure that all code:- necessary to accomplish an answer is neatly and clearly associated with the question heading,- works as intended, and that each line of code is properly accompanied by a comment explaining the purpose of the code,- is well-structured and easy to follow, and- is free of errors and warnings.You are also welcome (encouraged, in fact) to add comments to your script to explain your reasoning or thought process.