21. Reproducible Workflow

From Analysis to Transparent Reporting

Author

A. J. Smit

Published

2026/03/19

1 Introduction

A sound analysis is not complete until it is transparent, traceable, and reproducible. Reproducibility links data, code, model output, interpretation, and communication into one workflow.

2 Key Concepts

The chapter closes the sequence by foregrounding these principles.

  • Reproducibility means the analysis can be traced and rerun from source.
  • Transparent workflow keeps data, code, output, and interpretation connected.
  • Documented decisions make analyses easier to evaluate and revise.
  • Quarto and scripts support literate, inspectable analysis.
  • Reporting limitations and diagnostics is part of reproducible science, not an optional extra.

3 Core Principles

  • distinguish exploratory from confirmatory work,
  • keep code and narrative together,
  • document decisions,
  • report diagnostics and limitations,
  • make figures and tables reproducible from source.

4 Practical Tools

In this module, reproducibility is supported primarily through:

  • R scripts,
  • Quarto documents,
  • stable project structure,
  • explicit reporting of analytical choices.

5 Source

This chapter expands the placeholder material in:

  • 26-reproducible-workflow.qmd

Reuse

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@online{smit,_a._j.2026,
  author = {Smit, A. J., and J. Smit, A.},
  title = {21. {Reproducible} {Workflow}},
  date = {2026-03-19},
  url = {http://tangledbank.netlify.app/BCB744/basic_stats/21-reproducible-workflow.html},
  langid = {en}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
Smit, A. J., J. Smit A (2026) 21. Reproducible Workflow. http://tangledbank.netlify.app/BCB744/basic_stats/21-reproducible-workflow.html.