21. Reproducible Workflow
From Analysis to Transparent Reporting
1 Introduction
A sound analysis is not complete until it is transparent, traceable, and reproducible. Reproducibility links data, code, model output, interpretation, and communication into one workflow.
2 Key Concepts
The chapter closes the sequence by foregrounding these principles.
- Reproducibility means the analysis can be traced and rerun from source.
- Transparent workflow keeps data, code, output, and interpretation connected.
- Documented decisions make analyses easier to evaluate and revise.
- Quarto and scripts support literate, inspectable analysis.
- Reporting limitations and diagnostics is part of reproducible science, not an optional extra.
3 Core Principles
- distinguish exploratory from confirmatory work,
- keep code and narrative together,
- document decisions,
- report diagnostics and limitations,
- make figures and tables reproducible from source.
4 Practical Tools
In this module, reproducibility is supported primarily through:
- R scripts,
- Quarto documents,
- stable project structure,
- explicit reporting of analytical choices.
5 Source
This chapter expands the placeholder material in:
26-reproducible-workflow.qmd
Reuse
Citation
BibTeX citation:
@online{smit,_a._j.2026,
author = {Smit, A. J., and J. Smit, A.},
title = {21. {Reproducible} {Workflow}},
date = {2026-03-19},
url = {http://tangledbank.netlify.app/BCB744/basic_stats/21-reproducible-workflow.html},
langid = {en}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
Smit, A. J., J. Smit A (2026) 21. Reproducible Workflow. http://tangledbank.netlify.app/BCB744/basic_stats/21-reproducible-workflow.html.
